We get a lot of messages from female journalists, who ask inflamatory questions and then expect us to get angry. My personal favorite was the one that threatened to tell 4chan the truth so they’d ask for their money back.
I checked if there was a thread about her and, lo and behold, there was.
Someone asked what has Zoe actually done to deserve this, so I decided to…
I got in an argument with a guy the other day because he thinks it “should be called equalism not feminism”
Like if you’re offended just because the name of the female rights movement has a name suggesting so you’re clearly a misogynistic…
A Texas man is under arrest after gunning down a SWAT team member as the officer quietly tried to climb in through the apartment’s window during predawn hours.
Police State USAreports that a resident fatally shot Detective Charles “Chuck” Dinwiddie as the officer climbed in through a ground level window as part of a “no knock” raid. The officers were there due to suspicion that residents were in possession of controlled substances.
Upon hearing a noise, resident Marvin Louis Guy, 50, opened fire on the unidentified officers, shooting three others as well, although only one fatally.
Guy is currently being held on capital murder charges in connection with Dinwiddie’s death, even though it’s unclear how Guy was supposed to know that the men crawling in through the window were police officers since they hadn’t identified themselves.
The evidence sheet lists a laptop, a safe, a pistol, and a glass pipe, but no drugs were found. Given the evidence, why did police deem it necessary to seek a “no knock” warrant and why did a judge sign off on it?
Very little is known about Mr. Guy, but Dinwiddie left behind two children, all because his SWAT team went creeping into a home where the residents didn’t even have any drugs. Is that the best use of law enforcement tax dollars?
Guy’s bond has been set at $3 million dollars.
Thank you lieutenantnorals!
way more important than mike brown tbh
I won’t be surprised when he gets the death penalty.
This is the problem with “no knock” warrants. You have the right to defend yourself when someone breaks into your home unannounced.
Unless it’s a cop.
Why no knock warrants exist for low level crimes will never make sense to me. It puts literally everyone involved in extreme danger, from the officers entering, to the “suspect” and everyone in between, including any children in the house. This type of warrant got a man killed for nothing, and after “due process” we’re likely to see another man die for nothing.
Even ignoring the Fourth Amendment, these only put cops in danger because citizens don’t know until after the fact if it’s a cop or robber. As well as the citizen because he’s going to be approaching a cop with a weapon out.
Fuck, I would have shot him too.
i didnt think it could go too far
how dare you!
Lemme see if I understand this right. Expecting boys and girls to exist under the same social standards as one another, not treating breasts like they have magical powers, and altogether recognizing that the bodies of boys and girls are fundamentally equal… makes me a fucking pervert? Right.
If the first thing you think about when you see a 12 year old girl is sex, rather than say… a 12 yo girl who is being denied a fundamental right that her twin brother has… the problem is with you, not me.
Though I completely grasp why the pursuit of social equality is anathema to Feminists and why this in particular would rile you so.
Pro-active steps to actually demystify the female body completely fucks with the victim narrative that feminists depend on so heavily.
Wait, what??? Going topless is not a fundamental right… Sometimes egalitarians fight for the WEIRDEST things.
Except not being subject to irrational restrictions because of your gender is.
No one is mandating that people have to run around topless. And parents are free to dress their children however they wish.
However, what’s at issue is whether or not females should be required to cover up in circumstances where males are not.
I cannot in good conscience demand the neighbor lady keep her shirt on when I’m free to walk around without mine.
Sex positivity means many things, but it does not mean that all sex is positive or enjoyable.
I’m so sick of this line of rhetoric. You don’t wanna fuck? Don’t fuck. No one cares.
But don’t think you can be in relationships with people who do want to fuck without your lack of interest being a problem.
Hang out with other people who don’t want to fuck and be happy with your not fucking.
If the person of your romantic desires wants a sexual relationship, and you can’t provide that for them, FIND SOMEONE ELSE.
You can be asexual all you like - but DON’T force your asexuality on others. Just like they shouldn’t force their sexuality on you.