nah, he ran into her knife
he ran into her knife ten times
HE HAD IT COMING
HE ONLY HAS HIMSELF TO BLAME
IF YOU’D HAVE BEEN THERE
IF YOU HAD SEEN IT
I BET THAT YOU WOULD HAVE DONE THE SAME
Yo the feminist entitlement is out of control. Men are not allowed preferences at all! But for women it’s totally cool to pick and choose and shame men for not living up to their aesthetic standards. And they’ll spin a yarn of pseudo-logic several pages long to make this double standard sound reasonable, it’s ridiculous! They’re basically like “Do as I say not as I do.”
And they’re entitled to our obedience to their arbitrary fucking terms and conditions. I think not.
it’s ok to prefer shaved women. It’s not ok to say that all women should shave.
It’s ok to prefer ripped men. It’s not ok to say that all men should work out.
It’s ok to have a preference. it’s not ok to say everyone has to measure up to your preference.
BUT NO…according to you people it’s NOT okay to have those preferences. According to the people on this blog, it is not okay for Nash Grier to prefer girls who shave…because when he made those comments everyone on this blog called him a sexist for it.
So which is it?
When have I personally ever said that it’s not ok to have preferences? When have I ever personally said that I personally hate Nash Grier for his video? I stated my opinion on the topic. I did not say what everyone believes because unbelievably different people have different opinions.
-sings- Soooooome onnnnne’s confuuuuuuuused!!!!!
I’m pretty sure every person on one of these types of social justice blogs believes that preferences are absolutely okay and they don’t make you sexist, or racist, or homo- or transphobic, or anything like that. Social justice isn’t declaring everyone some type of -ist or -phobe because you have a preference.
Nash Grier’s “preferences” video was a declarative statement that affects people’s views. His preference is not something that needed to be broadcasted, and it was typically shallow and convoluted given how he wanted women to be both natural and hairless (the two are not inclusive given the state that women naturally grow hair everywhere…because we’re fucking mammals).
Having a preference is great. Sharing your preference for the entirety of the world is not - because I don’t care to hear what turns you on, much like you wouldn’t care to hear what turns me on. This isn’t like sharing what kind of food you enjoy - you will exhibit your sexual preference by simply approaching the desired mate and trying to date them. Making big, broad statements on the public forum of what you prefer to see in a potential partner is just fucking rude and uncalled for.
Mulan, if you’ll read my first comment, you will see that I said “you people”. Not “you”.
Rhea, I’m not confused in the slightest. I read hate comments about the video on this blog less than an hour ago.
And to that last person: get over it you giant crybaby. People are always going to say things that could piss you off. So what? Grow a pair and move on with your life. Just because his “declarative statement” was deemed “rude” by you doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be able to say it.
That’s your defense? “Get over it?” Why are you still floating up a stupid defense for a selfish and obviously disgusting person? Why are you still dwelling on ways to defend his ability to say whatever he wants on the public forum?
Fuck, you are such a crybaby. Get over it. People criticized his stupid comments because that’s what happens in the public forum - you say something for the world to see and people will criticize it.
Stupid fucking cunt.
You’re not “criticizing” though. You’re accusing him of misogyny and claiming he’s harming people. Learn the difference between critique and defamation/personal attacks.
Please point to where I called him a misogynist. Please actually cite where I used to word “misogyny.”
Nice attempt to straw-man, illiterate dumb fuck.
Clearly you can’t make a single post without slinging petty insults so I’ll make myself brief. By “you” I meant “you people who are attacking Nash Grier for his preferences video.” A general “you” is actually a fairly widespread and accepted part of the English lexicon. Being that you’re so much more literate than me, I’d think you’d know that.
You straw-man my position, and you expect me to be civil in the discourse? Excuse me, but kindly go fuck yourself. Preferably with a plugged-in curling iron. Make sure it’s on, though. Wouldn’t want you to miss out on a good experience.
Reading comprehension might not be your strong point, but your previous response to me started off directly targeting me - not a generalized population you’ve conjured in your head as a means to project your ideas and beliefs upon to better knock down, but me as in an individual person whom you were trying to address. You claimed that I wasn’t criticizing him - which I can and will admit I wasn’t doing in my first response to this entire conversation, nor did I claim to be of the position of trying to criticize him in this dialog. So you’d be right - I wasn’t criticizing him because I wasn’t trying to criticize him.
And right after that you fumble with this notion that labeled him a a misogynist. I asked for you to provide evidence of this claim and you failed to do so now clinging to your fucking blanket and crying that I’m being uncivil. Good. I don’t want to be civil with an intellectually gimped twat who thinks straw-man arguments are a good starting point in a discussion. Again, you can do some basic math of adding a hot curling iron directly to your anus - please and thank you.
Now that we’ve got that out of the way: do you have any actual points to raise that don’t involve you trying to suck the non-existent dick of Nash Grier as being some poor child caught in the cross-fires of a hateful movement that is trying to bend and distort his words out of context? If not, please go fuck yourself.
Someone’s got some serious issues. Have you talked to a therapist? Again, it was not a strawman…I literally said that my “you” was a general “you.” That means your side on the “Bashing Nash Grier vs Not Bashing Nash Grier.” But reading comprehension that you seem to praise so highly seems to be out of your reach as well, since you’re persisting that my use of “you” could only mean you specifically.
And the fact that I call you out on falling back on a myriad of personal petty insults is somehow clinging to a blanket is such a weak copout that I can’t even begin to take you seriously. You’re like an over-aggressive adolescent lashing out for attention. Do your parents ignore you? Do your schoolmates mock you? Do you lack friends? I’ve been strawmanned plenty on this site in arguing with feminists/SJWs, and my asshole has never been so delicate that it instantly thrusts me into attack mode where I feel I must spit venom in place of an argument.
Let me be clear, I acknowledge that you personally didn’t call Nash Grier a misogynist. I have however seen countless feminists call him a misogynist, and when I said “you” I was referring to the position against him in general, not a single solitary human being.
And as to me trying to “suck Nash Grier’s dick” I barely even know who he is. All I know is he’s some guy popular on youtube or vine or something who made a video about what he thinks women should or shouldn’t do/wear/whatever. I haven’t watched the video and I have no vested interest in his public image. That doesn’t mean I can’t have an opinion on feminists crying “misogyny” over a dude stating his opinions.
But go on, keep whining that I “strawmanned you” when I clearly didn’t. That’s the only thing you have to attack me with and you’re going to go on using it as an excuse to sling expletives until you go grey because you’re so dissatisfied with your life that you feel the need to try your hardest to hurt some stranger on the internet’s feelings.
I’m not even mad, I just pity you. Poor thing.
Finding a vegan dog bone is proving difficult -_-
Because dogs are carnivores, with identical digestive systems to wolves. There is no such thing as “vegan bone.”
Hint: plants don’t have bones.
god fucking damnit stop feeding your dog fucking garbage or get a fucking rabbit if you must have a ~vegan pet~
lmao vegan dog bone
A stick. The item you’re searching for is a stick.
bolding above comment because I laughed right the fuck out loud
I once met a vegan dog. It was unhealthiest looking animal I have ever seen.
Abusing/neglecting your dog because you’re scared of hurting animals. Oh the irony.
Tuesday (July 22), Bey posted a photo to Instagram in which she’s all kitted out like Rosie The Riveter, flexing under the words “We Can Do It.” She didn’t provide any context for the snap, but we’re pretty much assuming that she posted it to basically save the world from itself. Also because she looks damn good in loose denim.
Queen Bey isn’t new to feminism — she’s basically been dubbed an honorary Riot Grrrl by Bikini Kill’s Kathleen Hanna and she contributed an essay to Maria Shriver’s “The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Pushes Back from the Brink.” Oh, and she’s been repping the “f” word on tour with Jay Z, too, incorporating the term into her stage show in massive black and white letters.
Now tell us again why you don’t need feminism, ladies. The Beygency is listening…
Well shit - Beyonce got her photo taken?
Great rebuttal Beyonce!
There go all my well thought through reasons for being anti-feminist.
I love how this article just seems to assume that because Beyonce did something all the anti-feminist women and girls in the world who have dedicated time and energy to researching and understanding feminism and formulating their own ideas as to why they are against it are just going to crumble into tears at the sight of Beyonce posing as an overused war propaganda poster model and come running back into the arms of Mother Feminism and Godmother Bey.
The thing I take from this massively obnoxious article is that the author assumes that women are basically: 1) a hive mind who all apparently love the same (overrated) American pop singer and 2) weak-minded beings who will crumble into submission and conformity at even the slightest suggestion of disapproval from an authority figure. Like, are feminist writers trying to sabotage themselves at this point?
Polish doctor that refused to perform abortion named a “hero”
Dr Bogdan Chazan was visited by an expecting mother (32 weeks into pregnancy), who already had 5 miscarriages before and was worried about her health. It turned out that the fetus had hydrocephalus, undeveloped brain and was missing many bones from its skull. The Doctor refused to perform an abortion and didn’t send the woman to another hospital which could do so (according to polish law, if a doctor doesn’t want to perform an abortion, he has to choose another hospital which will agree to do so). Chazan was named a “local hero” and “true warrior of Jesus in the name of life of the unborn” by many polish politicians and catholic activists. He used conscience clause as an excuse for his actions.
The woman gave birth to the child through a C-section. She and her husband spent 10 painful days watching their deformed child die a horrible death. When she finally decided to speak out, she said:
“During these 10 days, no priest, no pro life activist or even dr Chazan came to see the child, to ask if they can help. It was really hard to look at our child. We knew what was coming, but it was still very hard to cope with”
Congratulations, pro-lifers - another “life” saved, another “happy” child and “happy” family.
If this gets 2,500 notes, I will make a sequel with whatever object gets most requested.
*lowered it to 2,500, since that’s more attainable. I don’t want people to feel like this is outside the realm of possibility. Also, the object requested much be possible to obtain and non-lethal to insert. Let’s see how bad the internet wants this. :P
Full Suck The Dick
Does “non-lethal” mean it can still inflict severe injury as long as it definitely won’t kill you
I’m pretty sure reblogging this is an all expense paid ticket to Hell.
Good thing I’m an Atheist.
Hordes of angry Amazonian women will roam the streets with huge clubs, killing any male they see for being a potential rapist.